Guide · Sheet G-411
Boom trucks and capital cost allowance
No CRA guidance we found puts a truck-mounted crane in a CCA class. Here is what the regulation and CRA texts establish, what depends on how your unit is classified, and the facts that decide it.
Not tax advice
These are the general rules as published by CRA, Finance Canada, Parliament and the courts, plus our reading of the regulation's wording, labelled as such. The class for a particular truck depends on its design, its use and your business; an accountant decides. The Productivity Mega Deduction is proposed, announced 2026-09-15, enactment not confirmed.
Capital cost allowance is the tax deduction for the cost of a depreciable asset, claimed class by class at the rate set for each class. For a boom truck the class matters twice: it sets the yearly rate, and it may decide whether a proposed immediate write-off applies at all.
R 03 mWhich CCA class? It is not settled
The class depends on how the unit is classified: as one truck or as a chassis plus a crane, and what the truck is designed and used for. Schedule II names no crane, boom or hoist1, and no CRA guidance we found places a truck-mounted crane in a class. Four classes can come into play. We also found nothing on whether the crane and the chassis are one property or two, whether a truck that carries loads on its deck is "designed for hauling freight", or whether the proposed immediate write-off would reach a boom truck.
| Class | Rate | What it needs | Fit for a boom truck |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10(a) automotive equipment | 30%2 | Property not included in any other class1 | Open: applies if no other class does |
| 10(h) contractor's movable equipment | 30% | Acquired for a construction business, or to lease to one | Open: depends on your business |
| 16(g) freight truck | 40%2 | Designed for and mainly used in hauling freight; GVWR over 11,788 kg1 | Open: depends on design and use |
| 8(i) residual | 20%1 | A tangible capital property in no other class; CRA's list describes it the same way and names no crane2 | Open: a crane that is its own property and fits none above |
| 38 (Class 22 is closed to property acquired after 1989)1 | 30%2 | Designed to excavate, move, place or compact earth, rock, concrete or asphalt | Generally not; possible if equipped to excavate |
R 06 mClass 10: automotive and contractor's movable equipment
Class 10 is written in two halves1. The first covers property "not included in any other class" and starts with paragraph (a), automotive equipment. The second covers property that "would otherwise be included in another Class in this Schedule", including paragraph (h), contractor's movable equipment acquired for a construction business or for lease to one, except property in Class 22 or 38.
CRA's archived bulletin IT-306R2 reads paragraph (h) as equipment that normally is moved from place to place in the course of a contractor's business. It says equipment leased by a contractor which would qualify if the contractor owned it is Class 10 property of the lessor3.
Our reading, for your accountant to test. For a contractor, paragraph (h) can pull a truck into Class 10 even where another class would otherwise take it. Outside construction, paragraph (a) applies only if no other class does, which is where Class 16 comes in; a crane that is its own property and fits no class may land in Class 8. No CRA ruling we found applies this to a boom truck.
| Owner | The question to put to your accountant |
|---|---|
| Contractor using its own truck on its jobs | Is it contractor's movable equipment acquired for a construction business, under 10(h)? |
| Rental company leasing bare trucks to contractors | Is it acquired for lease to another taxpayer's construction business, under 10(h)? Does operated hire change that? |
| Supplier delivering and placing its own materials | Do the three Class 16 tests fit its design and use? |
| Utility, sign or industrial maintenance business | Does another class fit before 10(a), or is the crane Class 8? |
R 09 mClass 16: freight trucks
CRA lists Class 16 at 40%2. Paragraph 16(g) sets three tests, one of them a GVWR over 11,788 kg, and a truck must meet all three1:
- Designed for hauling freight. Alberta's boom truck trade scope describes the chassis as one that typically keeps a payload hauling capacity4. Whether a deck that carries the loads the crane will place counts as freight design is not settled in anything we read.
- Primarily used in a business that includes hauling freight, by you or by a person you do not deal with at arm's length. A truck that mostly lifts, rather than hauls, may not pass, whatever its design.
- The weight. Paragraph 16(g) takes the term GVWR from the Motor Vehicle Safety Regulations; federal emission rules define it as the manufacturer's maximum design loaded weight5.
Do not read Class 16 as federal Class 7 and 8: Class 7 starts above 11,793 kg5, not the 11,788 kg in the CCA rule1, and Class 16 also needs freight design and use. A heavy tandem boom truck can clear the weight test and still fail the other two. See licence class and NSC and boom truck sizes. The gap is real money: 40% a year against 30% for Class 102.
R 12 mWhy cranes generally are not Class 38
Class 38 takes power-operated movable equipment designed for excavating, moving, placing or compacting earth, rock, concrete or asphalt, at 30%2. Its text points back to Class 22, which covers the same equipment but only property acquired before 1990, so Class 38 is the live class for a truck bought now1. CRA's bulletin IT-469R, dated September 28, 1990, says cranes and hoists used to lift or place objects or material generally do not qualify for Class 22 or 386. CRA marks it archived and not updated, so treat it as an old interpretation, not current law.
The same bulletin leaves a door open. Lifting equipment may fall into Class 22 or 38 if it is designed, modified or acquired with special accessories so it can excavate, move, place or compact those materials. It gives a truck-mounted cement mixer as qualifying, because it is designed to put its contents directly into place6. A 1973 Federal Court decision went the same way for mobile cranes sold with accessories that let them work as excavators: Class 22, not Class 107. It applied older wording, and we did not check later treatment. A boom truck fitted for concrete bucket work is not addressed.
For a boom truck, this matters less than it looks. Class 38 and Class 10 both carry 30%2, and paragraph 10(h) excludes property that belongs in Class 22 or 381. The question that moves the deduction is Class 16.
R 15 mThe Accelerated Investment Incentive
Normally only half the net addition counts in the year a truck is acquired: the half-year rule. The accelerated first-year allowance suspends it. CRA describes the original measure as up to three times the normal first-year deduction8 and says two times for property that becomes available for use from 2024 to 20278. That page was last modified 2025-07-21 and does not mention property acquired after 20248.
The regulation, consolidated to September 21, 2026, does, and it splits the incentive in two:
- Accelerated investment incentive property: acquired after November 20, 2018 and before 2025, available for use before 20289. Factor 1/2 if available before 2024, nil after 202310.
- Reaccelerated investment incentive property: acquired after 2024, available for use before 20349. Factor 1/2 if available before 2030, nil after 202910.
That matches the 2024 Fall Economic Statement proposal11. The sections' amendment histories list S.C. 2026, c. 3, Bill C-15's chapter, which received royal assent on March 26, 20261213.
Computed. A factor of 1/2 lifts the first-year base to 1.5 times cost with the half-year rule gone: three times the normal deduction. A nil factor leaves the base at cost: two times. A truck acquired in 2026 and available before 2030 gets 45% of cost in year one in Class 10 and 60% in Class 16; from 2030 to 2033, 30% and 40%. CRA's Class 10 example shows the same 15% against 45%8.
| Class and rule | Year 1 | Year 2 | Year 3 | After 3 years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Class 10, normal rules | 15% | 25.5% | 17.85% | 58.35% |
| Class 10, 3× (acquired after 2024, available before 2030) | 45% | 16.5% | 11.55% | 73.05% |
| Class 10, 2× (available 2030 to 2033; or 2024 to 2027 if acquired before 2025) | 30% | 21% | 14.7% | 65.7% |
| Class 16, normal rules | 20% | 32% | 19.2% | 71.2% |
| Class 16, 3× (same window as Class 10, 3×) | 60% | 16% | 9.6% | 85.6% |
| Class 16, 2× (same windows as Class 10, 2×) | 40% | 24% | 14.4% | 78.4% |
Assumed: the truck is alone in its class, no disposals, full 12-month tax years, and the declining-balance rate on what is left each year2. Used trucks can qualify, with limits: property already claimed on qualifies only if neither you nor a non-arm's-length person owned it before, and it did not come to you on a tax-deferred rollover8.
R 18 mThe proposed Productivity Mega Deduction
Proposed only
Announced 2026-09-15 by Finance Canada with draft legislative proposals. Enactment was not confirmed as of 2026-10-0514.
The proposal is a permanent immediate write-off for most depreciable property acquired on or after September 15, 202614. It excludes some buildings and classes and certain vehicles in Classes 10 and 10.1, without saying which Class 10 vehicles14. Property that does not qualify would keep the accelerated allowance above14.
On the release's wording only: a Class 16 truck is not named in the exclusions14; a Class 10 truck turns on which "certain vehicles" are excluded, which waits on the draft legislation. Enactment and the final text govern.
Immediate expensing that exists today does not look like a route for a conventional boom truck. The regulation's $1,500,000 regime for private corporations and individuals covers only property available for use before 2024, or before 2025 for individuals9. Budget 2025's immediate-expensing list names manufacturing and processing equipment, clean energy equipment and zero-emission vehicles, among other assets, and the chapter does not mention trucks or cranes15.
Do not time a purchase on a proposal alone. If it is not enacted, a truck bought on its strength falls back to the rules above.
R 21 mWhat to ask your accountant
Bring the facts that decide the class; most are on paper you already have: the GVWR on the compliance label, for the 11,788 kg test1; the build (a cargo deck specified to haul, or only the crane, and any excavating accessories); a rough split of hours lifting against hauling, and whose goods it carries; your line of business; whether the chassis and the crane were invoiced separately; and when you acquired it, when it was available for use, and who owned it before.
The questions
- Which class does this truck go in, and on what reading of paragraphs 10(a), 10(h) and 16(g), and Class 8?
- Are the crane and the chassis one property or two?
- Is it reaccelerated investment incentive property, and at what multiple for our dates?
- If the Productivity Mega Deduction is enacted, does it reach this truck?
- If the business leases instead, who claims CCA? See boom truck lease accounting.
- As a GST/HST registrant, can we claim input tax credits on the tax paid on the purchase16?
A zero-emission truck changes the list. CRA has Class 54 and Class 55 for zero-emission vehicles that would otherwise be in Class 10 or Class 162, and the incentive's general rule does not apply to those classes8.
BoomTrucks.ca is an independent reference: we do not rent, sell or lease equipment. For the purchase itself, see buying a boom truck and what drives a boom truck's price, or request a quote; it only goes to a company with your consent.
Questions people ask
What CCA class is a boom truck in Canada?
No CRA guidance we found settles it; it depends on how the unit is classified. Class 10, at 30%2, includes automotive equipment and contractor's movable equipment, paragraphs 10(a) and 10(h)1. Class 16, at 40%, needs a truck designed for and mainly used in hauling freight, with a GVWR over 11,788 kg21. An accountant decides on your facts.
Is a boom truck Class 16 for CCA?
Only if it meets all three tests in paragraph 16(g): designed for hauling freight, primarily used in a business that includes hauling freight, and a GVWR over 11,788 kg1. Weight alone is not enough.
Can I write off a boom truck in the first year?
Not in full under the rules in force. For a truck acquired after 2024 and available for use before 2030, the regulation's factor gives three times the normal first-year deduction10: 45% of cost in Class 10, instead of 15% (computed). From 2030 to 2033 it is two times, 30%. CRA's page, last modified 2025-07-21, does not cover property acquired after 20248. A full immediate write-off is only proposed (next question).
Does the Productivity Mega Deduction apply to boom trucks?
Is a boom truck Class 38 equipment?
Generally not. An archived CRA bulletin says cranes that lift or place objects or material generally do not qualify for Class 22 or 38 unless built or equipped for earth-moving work6; a 1973 court decision found mobile cranes sold with excavating accessories were Class 227. Class 38's rate is 30%2, the same as Class 10's.
Sources
- Income Tax Regulations (C.R.C., c. 945), Schedule II Capital Cost AllowancesJustice Laws Website (Government of Canada) · current to 2026-09-21, last amended 2026-06-18; verified 2026-10-06
- Capital cost allowance (CCA) classesCanada Revenue Agency · page modified 2026-08-31; verified 2026-10-05
- IT-306R2 ARCHIVED - Capital Cost Allowance - Contractor's Movable EquipmentCanada Revenue Agency · bulletin dated 1994-03-25; archived, not updated; verified 2026-10-06
- Scope of Profession - Crane and Hoisting Equipment Operator - Boom TruckGovernment of Alberta (Tradesecrets) · page as published 2026-10-05; verified 2026-10-05
- Heavy-duty Vehicle and Engine Greenhouse Gas Emission Regulations (SOR/2013-24), s. 1 definitionsJustice Laws Website (Government of Canada) · current to 2026-09-21; verified 2026-10-05
- IT-469R ARCHIVED - Capital cost allowance - Earth-moving equipmentCanada Revenue Agency · bulletin dated 1990-09-28; archived, not updated; verified 2026-10-05
- Federal Court of Canada, Trial Division, decision of 1973-12-11 on cranes sold with excavating accessories (Federal Courts Reports)Federal Court of Canada, Trial Division (Federal Courts Reports) · decided 1973-12-11; not checked for later treatment; verified 2026-10-06
- Accelerated investment incentiveCanada Revenue Agency · page modified 2025-07-21; verified 2026-10-05
- Income Tax Regulations (C.R.C., c. 945), section 1104Justice Laws Website (Government of Canada) · current to 2026-09-21, last amended 2026-06-18; verified 2026-10-06
- Income Tax Regulations (C.R.C., c. 945), section 1100Justice Laws Website (Government of Canada) · current to 2026-09-21, last amended 2026-06-18; verified 2026-10-06
- Fall Economic Statement 2024 - Tax Measures: Supplementary InformationDepartment of Finance Canada · tabled 2024-12-16; verified 2026-10-05
- Bill C-15, Budget 2025 Implementation Act, No. 1 - first reading text (summary)Parliament of Canada · first reading 2025-11-18; verified 2026-10-05
- LEGISinfo - Bill C-15 (45th Parliament, 1st session), Budget 2025 Implementation Act, No. 1Parliament of Canada · royal assent 2026-03-26; verified 2026-10-05
- Government of Canada introduces new Productivity Mega Deduction (news release)Department of Finance Canada · released 2026-09-15 (proposed measure); verified 2026-10-05
- Budget 2025, Chapter 1: Building a stronger Canadian economyDepartment of Finance Canada · Budget 2025, Chapter 1 only (tax annex not read); verified 2026-10-06
- Input tax credits - GST/HSTCanada Revenue Agency · page modified 2024-11-19; verified 2026-10-05
Related
- G-401 Operator certification by province Thresholds, certificates and issuers in every province and territory we researched, from Alberta's boom truck trade to Ontario's MCO 1 and 2.
- G-402 Inspection rules Annual engineer inspections, two-year NDT cycles, Ontario's crane log and which CSA edition each province adopts.
- G-403 Power-line clearance The limits of approach side by side, the Alberta 7 m trigger, BC safety watchers and Ontario signallers.